A unified scoreboard for internet culture
Speedrunning, meme recall, ratio wars — these competitions already exist in fragments. The InterOlympics gives them a single stage, a shared format, and a result that means something.
INTEROLYMPICS
The InterOlympics is a branded competition format pitting humans against AI across 15 internet-native events — from Speed Googling to Cursed Comment Generation. It's built for anyone who has ever argued with ChatGPT and felt something. We treat the Man vs. Machine question as sport, not existential dread.
Every event is internet-native, Man vs. AI, and judged with the gravity of the 100-meter final. The format is simple: one winner, one loser, and a running tally that decides — once and for all — who is better at the internet.
Captcha Completion is humans-only by definition. Apology Letter judged on genuine remorse. Rickroll Avoidance tests reflex and lived suspicion. These events exist because being human online is its own skill set — and it deserves a gold medal.
Products from INTEROLYMPICS.
Products for this channel will appear here.
This is not a stunt. It is a competition format built to run, repeat, and grow. Here is what a fully realized InterOlympics delivers for its audience and its community.
Speedrunning, meme recall, ratio wars — these competitions already exist in fragments. The InterOlympics gives them a single stage, a shared format, and a result that means something.
Every event produces a clip, a score, and a side to root for. AI commentary on human performance — live, slightly wrong, extremely confident — creates a content format that is inherently repeatable across every event.
Most people use AI daily and feel quietly threatened by it. A competition format gives that tension a funny, low-stakes arena. Humans beating AI at writing a bad apology is more satisfying than beating it at chess.
Before the official program is announced, the public nominates events. The submissions become content. The voting becomes engagement. The final list belongs to the audience that built it.
The InterOlympics is early-stage and built to be shaped. Here is what we bring to the process — and what we need from collaborators to make it real.
We define the format for each of the 15 draft events: rules, judging criteria, human vs. AI structure, and the conditions under which a winner is declared. Nothing launches without a clear rulebook.
Live stream, short-form clip, real-time scoreboard, or microsite — the InterOlympics is inherently multi-format. We work with partners to match the event structure to the right channel and production scale.
The pilot event is the campaign. We help identify the single event most likely to generate a shareable moment, build the audience nomination period around it, and structure the launch for organic reach.
As a non-profit, we operate with complete transparency — every dollar, every partnership, every judging call is documented and public. The scoreboard is honest. So is everything behind it.
A non-profit competition format built for the browser tab generation — transparent, community-driven, and deadpan serious about internet nonsense.
The InterOlympics borrows the structure and prestige of the Olympic Games and applies it to skills, behaviors, and absurdities that only exist online. It is not anti-AI. It is pro-contest. The Man vs. Machine question is treated as sport — with a scoreboard, a winner, and no excuses.
We are a non-profit. Every dollar that comes into this project is accounted for and publicly reported. Our event list is built with community input. Our judging criteria are published before each event. There is no black box here — only a very public competition.
The InterOlympics sits in the tradition of events that take themselves just seriously enough to be fun: World Cheese Rolling, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest — but for the generation that lives in browser tabs. We are in early-stage development and looking for collaborators, participants, and anyone who has ever felt something after arguing with ChatGPT.
No. The InterOlympics is pro-contest. It treats the Man vs. AI question as sport rather than existential dread. AI competes in every event. In some events — Terms and Conditions Speed Read, Password Strength — AI is the expected winner. The format needs both sides to be credible.
We are a non-profit and we are fully transparent about every dollar. Funding goes toward event production, platform costs, and community infrastructure. A public breakdown is available and updated as the project develops. There are no hidden fees, no undisclosed partnerships.
Each event has a published rulebook before it runs. Judging criteria are defined in advance: some events use audience voting, some use measurable outputs like click-through rate, and some — like Captcha Completion — are objective by definition. We publish the criteria so the competition is legible, not just entertaining.
The event list is still in draft. We are running a public nomination period before the official program is announced — you can submit events, vote on proposals, and follow the shortlist as it develops. Get in touch through this page and we will add you to the process.
The InterOlympics is in development and we are looking for collaborators, channel partners, and anyone with a strong opinion about what humans and AI should compete at. Reach out and we will tell you exactly where things stand.
Walk through each step at your own pace.
Describe this step.
INTEROLYMPICS
The InterOlympics is a branded competition format pitting humans against AI across 15 internet-native events — from Speed Googling to Cursed Comment Generation. It's built for anyone who has ever argued with ChatGPT and felt something. We treat the Man vs. Machine question as sport, not existential dread.
Every event is internet-native, Man vs. AI, and judged with the gravity of the 100-meter final. The format is simple: one winner, one loser, and a running tally that decides — once and for all — who is better at the internet.
Captcha Completion is humans-only by definition. Apology Letter judged on genuine remorse. Rickroll Avoidance tests reflex and lived suspicion. These events exist because being human online is its own skill set — and it deserves a gold medal.
Products from INTEROLYMPICS.
Products for this channel will appear here.
This is not a stunt. It is a competition format built to run, repeat, and grow. Here is what a fully realized InterOlympics delivers for its audience and its community.
Speedrunning, meme recall, ratio wars — these competitions already exist in fragments. The InterOlympics gives them a single stage, a shared format, and a result that means something.
Every event produces a clip, a score, and a side to root for. AI commentary on human performance — live, slightly wrong, extremely confident — creates a content format that is inherently repeatable across every event.
Most people use AI daily and feel quietly threatened by it. A competition format gives that tension a funny, low-stakes arena. Humans beating AI at writing a bad apology is more satisfying than beating it at chess.
Before the official program is announced, the public nominates events. The submissions become content. The voting becomes engagement. The final list belongs to the audience that built it.
The InterOlympics is early-stage and built to be shaped. Here is what we bring to the process — and what we need from collaborators to make it real.
We define the format for each of the 15 draft events: rules, judging criteria, human vs. AI structure, and the conditions under which a winner is declared. Nothing launches without a clear rulebook.
Live stream, short-form clip, real-time scoreboard, or microsite — the InterOlympics is inherently multi-format. We work with partners to match the event structure to the right channel and production scale.
The pilot event is the campaign. We help identify the single event most likely to generate a shareable moment, build the audience nomination period around it, and structure the launch for organic reach.
As a non-profit, we operate with complete transparency — every dollar, every partnership, every judging call is documented and public. The scoreboard is honest. So is everything behind it.
A non-profit competition format built for the browser tab generation — transparent, community-driven, and deadpan serious about internet nonsense.
The InterOlympics borrows the structure and prestige of the Olympic Games and applies it to skills, behaviors, and absurdities that only exist online. It is not anti-AI. It is pro-contest. The Man vs. Machine question is treated as sport — with a scoreboard, a winner, and no excuses.
We are a non-profit. Every dollar that comes into this project is accounted for and publicly reported. Our event list is built with community input. Our judging criteria are published before each event. There is no black box here — only a very public competition.
The InterOlympics sits in the tradition of events that take themselves just seriously enough to be fun: World Cheese Rolling, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest — but for the generation that lives in browser tabs. We are in early-stage development and looking for collaborators, participants, and anyone who has ever felt something after arguing with ChatGPT.
No. The InterOlympics is pro-contest. It treats the Man vs. AI question as sport rather than existential dread. AI competes in every event. In some events — Terms and Conditions Speed Read, Password Strength — AI is the expected winner. The format needs both sides to be credible.
We are a non-profit and we are fully transparent about every dollar. Funding goes toward event production, platform costs, and community infrastructure. A public breakdown is available and updated as the project develops. There are no hidden fees, no undisclosed partnerships.
Each event has a published rulebook before it runs. Judging criteria are defined in advance: some events use audience voting, some use measurable outputs like click-through rate, and some — like Captcha Completion — are objective by definition. We publish the criteria so the competition is legible, not just entertaining.
The event list is still in draft. We are running a public nomination period before the official program is announced — you can submit events, vote on proposals, and follow the shortlist as it develops. Get in touch through this page and we will add you to the process.
The InterOlympics is in development and we are looking for collaborators, channel partners, and anyone with a strong opinion about what humans and AI should compete at. Reach out and we will tell you exactly where things stand.
Walk through each step at your own pace.
Describe this step.